The Magnetic Field Shows Earth's Young Age

Sorry, read "Origin and Destiny of the Earth's Magnetic Field.

Barne's theory for a young magnetic age for earth is the only theory of the

source of the earth's dipole magnet that is supported by the following

important FACTS:

1. A rigorous mathematical physics solution

2. A history of real-time evaluations of the state of the magnet (its

magnetic moment). Gives evolutionists a "Maloox Moment." :_))

3. A clearly identified source of energy (its won magnetic field energy).

4. A definitive predictive value.

5. A means of computing its source energy and subjecting that value to an

an independent check that would have falsified the the theory had there

not been a check.

On the other hand, the presumed dynamo theory has no substantive

theoretical basis and no definitive predictive value. Its presumed reversal

mechanism has admittedly remained inscrutable. The presumed supporting

paleomagnetic data contributes to the NOISE, not the signal.

This coupled with the many other evidences of a "young" earth leaves

the evolutionary hypothesis back in the dinasaur era of science.

Interesting how the latest scientific findings on origins are, that

everything came from nothing, supports the Creation Model. They just can't

bring themselves to accept that a Creator God did this.

Unfortunately for evolutionary scientists, the reversal _hypothesis_ has

absolutely no valid scientific theoretical basis. Furthermore, rock

magenetization cannot be used to support these so-called reversals becasue

there is a self-reversal process known to exist in rocks, completely

indedendent of the earth's magnetic field (Thomas G. BArnes, "Depletion of

the Earth's Magnetic Field").

Do you see what's happening? They have a "factual" uniformatarian

hypothsis for an "old earth" and when they discover this doesn't add up due

to lack of any empirical evidence they decide that "punctuated equilibriam"

is what must have happened. Then they have a problem with the earth's

magnetic field and must, based on their evolutionary belief system attempt to

explain it away with another VERY weak hypothesis of the dynamo hypothesis.

The data used by Barnes and others were truly for the earth's dipole magnet.

to get them, world wide measurements had to be made and integrated over a

considerable period of time and over the entire globe. NO LOCAL or REGIONAL

measurement of magnetic moment could ever be used to do this alone since

there are innumerable local magnetic fields which can strongly influence

and affect, or mask the field in any given region. Thus, to think that the

remanent magnetism in a suite of rocks or an archeological site could be used

to determine the earth's overall dipole magnetic strength or direction

accurately at that time in history is naive extrapolation carried to extremes,

particularly if such a determination is in conflict with that measured on a

worldwide basis.

In addition, it's just another weak hypothesis to overcome the previous

weak hypothesis. DO you see what the belief system (if you will) of

evolutionary thought does? First they state categorically a uniformatarian

geology. Then when no fossil evidence supports transitional forms they jump

to the "punctuated equilibrium" hypothesis along with catastrophism.

The analysis developed by Dr. Barnes is based on sound physics, careful

calculations, and solid data. The dynamo hypothesis, and the fluctuating and

reversing magnetic field concept (except on a localized basis), are little

more than the ad hoc notions, with no sound basis in either theory or

measurement.

The only real reason for rejecting the first and promoting the

second is that the first supports recent special Creation; the second tries

to salvage a bankrupt evolutionary uniformatarianism.

When you take all the evidence for a young earth, the evidence of

paleontology, biochemistry (remember Denton's proteins), the laws of science

(yes, the Law Giver), DNA, the incredible complexty of timing, space,

and life, etc., etc., it boils down to, not the facts as to believing in

A Creator God, but the will.

You see, evolutionists cannot

let this hypothesis be untrue as it sticks another pin in their fragile

baloon of evolution. The "air" has already gone out of it, and they

are running out of "patches." :-)))

Ah, the faith of "hopeful monster" mentality. And they say Christians

refuse to see the facts. :)) That's just it. We do! And, it confirms to us

everyday, that "In the beginning God CREATED the Heavens and the earth..."

Just take a look at empirical science through the Creation Model?

I'll say it again. How can anyone make an intelligent decision on partial

information? We are living in exciting days for the Christian. "Our

redemption draweth nigh."

Look around you. Look at the prophetic happenings in the world (don't give me

that nonsense about self-fulfilling prophecy, ad pukem :)).

When you put the prophecies of the Bible together with what's

happening in empirical science, and the world, one is left without

excuse. But, as I said He's "pro-choice." He won't force anyone to

to "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shal be saved."

"As in the days of Noah shall it be." And, it is.