BRAINWASHED #5
Let us now consider the beginnings of life itself.
By chance, nothingness developed into substance. That evolved into a
very highly complex organization... without a designer. Darwinists assume
that life, or the primitive cell, arose by pure chance. For example, by chance
some amino acids were formed. Then from these the necessary protein was
formed.
The first problem is that the rate of destruction of even relatively
simple chemical compounds, such as amino acids, by ultraviolet light or
electrical discharges far exceeds their rate of formation. No significant
quantity would thus ever be produced.
Another insuperable barrier is that these amino acids would have to be
arranged in an exact sequence to form a protein...just like the letters in a
sentence. Mere laws of chemistry and physics cannot do that.
The probability of a protein of only 50 amino acids forming by chance
would be 1/10 to the 65th power, or in layman language-
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000 to ONE!
Even the very simplest cell contains several thousand different kinds of
proteins, and many billions of each kind, plus all kinds of DNA,RNA, and other
highly complex molecules, along with many complex structures, arranged in an
incredibly complex system.
DNA and RNA are required to produce protein enzymes, but protein enzymes
are required to produce DNA and RNA. Which, then, came first?
Dr. N.W. Pirie of the Rothamstead Experimental Station at Harpenden,
England, rejects this whole concept of spontaneous biogenesis simply on the
well-founded fact that "complicated molecules such as proteins do not, in our
scientific experience, arise spontaneously, even by stages. And all forms of
life known today are dependent on protein."
Dr. John Moore spoke during the annual session of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science. He described the theory that man
evolved from "amoeba and sea-slimes" as an "incredible religion," but not
"science."
Dr. John Moore stated:
"Chromosome variation in animals does not correspond to predictions
based on evolution theory. There is absolutely no pattern of increase of
chromosome number from less complex to more complex, but this should take
place if evolution were true. Furthermore, hereditary material in the genes of
chromosomes shows great variation, frogs having more genetic material that do
humans, which contradicts the theory of evolution. Darwinism is more illogical
than biological."
Index - Evolution or Creation
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231