Sister Projects: Wikichristian | WikiMD
BelieversCafe is a large collection of christian articles with over 40,000 pages
Our sponsors:
Index [<< | >>]
First Part [<< | >>]
Question: 91 [<< | >>]
We have now to consider the production of the first man's body. Under
this head there are four points of inquiry:
(1) The matter from which it was produced;
(2) The author by whom it was produced;
(3) The disposition it received in its production;
(4) The mode and order of its production.
Index [<< | >>]
First Part [<< | >>]
Question: 91 [<< | >>]
Article: 1 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that the body of the first man was not made of the
slime of the earth. For it is an act of greater power to make something
out of nothing than out of something; because "not being" is farther off
from actual existence than "being in potentiality." But since man is the
most honorable of God's lower creatures, it was fitting that in the
production of man's body, the power of God should be most clearly shown.
Therefore it should not have been made of the slime of the earth, but out
of nothing.
Objection 2: Further, the heavenly bodies are nobler than earthly bodies. But
the human body has the greatest nobility; since it is perfected by the
noblest form, which is the rational soul. Therefore it should not be made
of an earthly body, but of a heavenly body.
Objection 3: Further, fire and air are nobler than earth and water, as is
clear from their subtlety. Therefore, since the human body is most noble,
it should rather have been made of fire and air than of the slime of the
earth.
Objection 4: Further, the human body is composed of the four elements.
Therefore it was not made of the slime of the earth, but of the four
elements.
On the contrary, It is written (@Gn. 2:7): "God made man of the slime of
the earth."
I answer that, As God is perfect in His works, He bestowed perfection on
all of them according to their capacity: "God's works are perfect" (@Dt. 32:4). He Himself is simply perfect by the fact that "all things are
pre-contained" in Him, not as component parts, but as "united in one
simple whole," as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. v); in the same way as
various effects pre-exist in their cause, according to its one virtue.
This perfection is bestowed on the angels, inasmuch as all things which
are produced by God in nature through various forms come under their
knowledge. But on man this perfection is bestowed in an inferior way. For
he does not possess a natural knowledge of all natural things, but is in
a manner composed of all things, since he has in himself a rational soul
of the genus of spiritual substances, and in likeness to the heavenly
bodies he is removed from contraries by an equable temperament. As to the
elements, he has them in their very substance, yet in such a way that the
higher elements, fire and air, predominate in him by their power; for
life is mostly found where there is heat, which is from fire; and where
there is humor, which is of the air. But the inferior elements abound in
man by their substance; otherwise the mingling of elements would not be
evenly balanced, unless the inferior elements, which have the less power,
predominated in quantity. Therefore the body of man is said to have been
formed from the slime of the earth; because earth and water mingled are
called slime, and for this reason man is called 'a little world,' because
all creatures of the world are in a way to be found in him.
Reply to Objection 1: The power of the Divine Creator was manifested in man's
body when its matter was produced by creation. But it was fitting that
the human body should be made of the four elements, that man might have
something in common with the inferior bodies, as being something between
spiritual and corporeal substances.
Reply to Objection 2: Although the heavenly body is in itself nobler than the
earthly body, yet for the acts of the rational soul the heavenly body is
less adapted. For the rational soul receives the knowledge of truth in a
certain way through the senses, the organs of which cannot be formed of a
heavenly body which is impassible. Nor is it true that something of the
fifth essence enters materially into the composition of the human body,
as some say, who suppose that the soul is united to the body by means of
light. For, first of all, what they say is false---that light is a body.
Secondly, it is impossible for something to be taken from the fifth
essence, or from a heavenly body, and to be mingled with the elements,
since a heavenly body is impassible; wherefore it does not enter into the
composition of mixed bodies, except as in the effects of its power.
Reply to Objection 3: If fire and air, whose action is of greater power,
predominated also in quantity in the human body, they would entirely draw
the rest into themselves, and there would be no equality in the mingling,
such as is required in the composition of man, for the sense of touch,
which is the foundation of the other senses. For the organ of any
particular sense must not actually have the contraries of which that
sense has the perception, but only potentially; either in such a way that
it is entirely void of the whole "genus" of such contraries---thus, for
instance, the pupil of the eye is without color, so as to be in
potentiality as regards all colors; which is not possible in the organ of
touch, since it is composed of the very elements, the qualities of which
are perceived by that sense---or so that the organ is a medium between
two contraries, as much needs be the case with regard to touch; for the
medium is in potentiality to the extremes.
Reply to Objection 4: In the slime of the earth are earth, and water binding the
earth together. Of the other elements, Scripture makes no mention,
because they are less in quantity in the human body, as we have said; and
because also in the account of the Creation no mention is made of fire
and air, which are not perceived by senses of uncultured men such as
those to whom the Scripture was immediately addressed.
Index [<< | >>]
First Part [<< | >>]
Question: 91 [<< | >>]
Article: 2 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that the human body was not produced by God
immediately. For Augustine says (De Trin. iii, 4), that "corporeal things
are disposed by God through the angels." But the human body was made of
corporeal matter, as stated above (Article [1]). Therefore it was produced by
the instrumentality of the angels, and not immediately by God.
Objection 2: Further, whatever can be made by a created power, is not
necessarily produced immediately by God. But the human body can be
produced by the created power of a heavenly body; for even certain
animals are produced from putrefaction by the active power of a heavenly
body; and Albumazar says that man is not generated where heat and cold
are extreme, but only in temperate regions. Therefore the human body was
not necessarily produced immediately by God.
Objection 3: Further, nothing is made of corporeal matter except by some
material change. But all corporeal change is caused by a movement of a
heavenly body, which is the first movement. Therefore, since the human
body was produced from corporeal matter, it seems that a heavenly body
had part in its production.
Objection 4: Further, Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. vii, 24) that man's body
was made during the work of the six days, according to the causal virtues
which God inserted in corporeal creatures; and that afterwards it was
actually produced. But what pre-exists in the corporeal creature by
reason of causal virtues can be produced by some corporeal body.
Therefore the human body was produced by some created power, and not
immediately by God.
On the contrary, It is written (Ecclus. 17:1): "God created man out of
the earth."
I answer that, The first formation of the human body could not be by the
instrumentality of any created power, but was immediately from God. Some,
indeed, supposed that the forms which are in corporeal matter are derived
from some immaterial forms; but the Philosopher refutes this opinion
(Metaph. vii), for the reason that forms cannot be made in themselves,
but only in the composite, as we have explained (Question [65], Article [4]); and
because the agent must be like its effect, it is not fitting that a pure
form, not existing in matter, should produce a form which is in matter,
and which form is only made by the fact that the composite is made. So a
form which is in matter can only be the cause of another form that is in
matter, according as composite is made by composite. Now God, though He
is absolutely immaterial, can alone by His own power produce matter by
creation: wherefore He alone can produce a form in matter, without the
aid of any preceding material form. For this reason the angels cannot
transform a body except by making use of something in the nature of a
seed, as Augustine says (De Trin. iii, 19). Therefore as no pre-existing
body has been formed whereby another body of the same species could be
generated, the first human body was of necessity made immediately by God.
Reply to Objection 1: Although the angels are the ministers of God, as regards
what He does in bodies, yet God does something in bodies beyond the
angels' power, as, for instance, raising the dead, or giving sight to
the blind: and by this power He formed the body of the first man from the
slime of the earth. Nevertheless the angels could act as ministers in the
formation of the body of the first man, in the same way as they will do
at the last resurrection by collecting the dust.
Reply to Objection 2: Perfect animals, produced from seed, cannot be made by the
sole power of a heavenly body, as Avicenna imagined; although the power
of a heavenly body may assist by co-operation in the work of natural
generation, as the Philosopher says (Phys. ii, 26), "man and the sun
beget man from matter." For this reason, a place of moderate temperature
is required for the production of man and other animals. But the power of
heavenly bodies suffices for the production of some imperfect animals
from properly disposed matter: for it is clear that more conditions are
required to produce a perfect than an imperfect thing.
Reply to Objection 3: The movement of the heavens causes natural changes; but not
changes that surpass the order of nature, and are caused by the Divine
Power alone, as for the dead to be raised to life, or the blind to see:
like to which also is the making of man from the slime of the earth.
Reply to Objection 4: An effect may be said to pre-exist in the causal virtues of
creatures, in two ways. First, both in active and in passive
potentiality, so that not only can it be produced out of pre-existing
matter, but also that some pre-existing creature can produce it.
Secondly, in passive potentiality only; that is, that out of pre-existing
matter it can be produced by God. In this sense, according to Augustine,
the human body pre-existed in the previous work in their causal virtues.
Index [<< | >>]
First Part [<< | >>]
Question: 91 [<< | >>]
Article: 3 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that the body of man was not given an apt
disposition. For since man is the noblest of animals, his body ought to
be the best disposed in what is proper to an animal, that is, in sense
and movement. But some animals have sharper senses and quicker movement
than man; thus dogs have a keener smell, and birds a swifter flight.
Therefore man's body was not aptly disposed.
Objection 2: Further, perfect is what lacks nothing. But the human body lacks
more than the body of other animals, for these are provided with covering
and natural arms of defense, in which man is lacking. Therefore the human
body is very imperfectly disposed.
Objection 3: Further, man is more distant from plants than he is from the
brutes. But plants are erect in stature, while brutes are prone in
stature. Therefore man should not be of erect stature.
On the contrary, It is written (@Eccles. 7:30): "God made man right."
I answer that, All natural things were produced by the Divine art, and
so may be called God's works of art. Now every artist intends to give to
his work the best disposition; not absolutely the best, but the best as
regards the proposed end; and even if this entails some defect, the
artist cares not: thus, for instance, when man makes himself a saw for
the purpose of cutting, he makes it of iron, which is suitable for the
object in view; and he does not prefer to make it of glass, though this
be a more beautiful material, because this very beauty would be an
obstacle to the end he has in view. Therefore God gave to each natural
being the best disposition; not absolutely so, but in the view of its
proper end. This is what the Philosopher says (Phys. ii, 7): "And because
it is better so, not absolutely, but for each one's substance."
Now the proximate end of the human body is the rational soul and its
operations; since matter is for the sake of the form, and instruments are
for the action of the agent. I say, therefore, that God fashioned the
human body in that disposition which was best, as most suited to such a
form and to such operations. If defect exists in the disposition of the
human body, it is well to observe that such defect arises as a necessary
result of the matter, from the conditions required in the body, in order
to make it suitably proportioned to the soul and its operations.
Reply to Objection 1: The sense of touch, which is the foundation of the other
senses, is more perfect in man than in any other animal; and for this
reason man must have the most equable temperament of all animals.
Moreover man excels all other animals in the interior sensitive powers,
as is clear from what we have said above (Question [78], Article [4]). But by a kind of
necessity, man falls short of the other animals in some of the exterior
senses; thus of all animals he has the least sense of smell. For man
needs the largest brain as compared to the body; both for his greater
freedom of action in the interior powers required for the intellectual
operations, as we have seen above (Question [84], Article [7]); and in order that the
low temperature of the brain may modify the heat of the heart, which has
to be considerable in man for him to be able to stand erect. So that size
of the brain, by reason of its humidity, is an impediment to the smell,
which requires dryness. In the same way, we may suggest a reason why some
animals have a keener sight, and a more acute hearing than man; namely,
on account of a hindrance to his senses arising necessarily from the
perfect equability of his temperament. The same reason suffices to
explain why some animals are more rapid in movement than man, since this
excellence of speed is inconsistent with the equability of the human
temperament.
Reply to Objection 2: Horns and claws, which are the weapons of some animals, and
toughness of hide and quantity of hair or feathers, which are the
clothing of animals, are signs of an abundance of the earthly element;
which does not agree with the equability and softness of the human
temperament. Therefore such things do not suit the nature of man. Instead
of these, he has reason and hands whereby he can make himself arms and
clothes, and other necessaries of life, of infinite variety. Wherefore
the hand is called by Aristotle (De Anima iii, 8), "the organ of
organs." Moreover this was more becoming to the rational nature, which is
capable of conceiving an infinite number of things, so as to make for
itself an infinite number of instruments.
Reply to Objection 3: An upright stature was becoming to man for four reasons.
First, because the senses are given to man, not only for the purpose of
procuring the necessaries of life, which they are bestowed on other
animals, but also for the purpose of knowledge. Hence, whereas the other
animals take delight in the objects of the senses only as ordered to food
and sex, man alone takes pleasure in the beauty of sensible objects for
its own sake. Therefore, as the senses are situated chiefly in the face,
other animals have the face turned to the ground, as it were for the
purpose of seeking food and procuring a livelihood; whereas man has his
face erect, in order that by the senses, and chiefly by sight, which is
more subtle and penetrates further into the differences of things, he may
freely survey the sensible objects around him, both heavenly and earthly,
so as to gather intelligible truth from all things. Secondly, for the
greater freedom of the acts of the interior powers; the brain, wherein
these actions are, in a way, performed, not being low down, but lifted up
above other parts of the body. Thirdly, because if man's stature were
prone to the ground he would need to use his hands as fore-feet; and thus
their utility for other purposes would cease. Fourthly, because if man's
stature were prone to the ground, and he used his hands as fore-feet, he
would be obliged to take hold of his food with his mouth. Thus he would
have a protruding mouth, with thick and hard lips, and also a hard
tongue, so as to keep it from being hurt by exterior things; as we see in
other animals. Moreover, such an attitude would quite hinder speech,
which is reason's proper operation.
Nevertheless, though of erect stature, man is far above plants. For
man's superior part, his head, is turned towards the superior part of the
world, and his inferior part is turned towards the inferior world; and
therefore he is perfectly disposed as to the general situation of his
body. Plants have the superior part turned towards the lower world, since
their roots correspond to the mouth; and their inferior part towards the
upper world. But brute animals have a middle disposition, for the
superior part of the animal is that by which it takes food, and the
inferior part that by which it rids itself of the surplus.
Index [<< | >>]
First Part [<< | >>]
Question: 91 [<< | >>]
Article: 4 [<< | >>]
Objection 1: It would seem that the production of the human body is not
fittingly described in Scripture. For, as the human body was made by God,
so also were the other works of the six days. But in the other works it
is written, "God said; Let it be made, and it was made." Therefore the
same should have been said of man.
Objection 2: Further, the human body was made by God immediately, as
explained above (Article [2]). Therefore it was not fittingly said, "Let us make
man."
Objection 3: Further, the form of the human body is the soul itself which is
the breath of life. Therefore, having said, "God made man of the slime of
the earth," he should not have added: "And He breathed into him the
breath of life."
Objection 4: Further, the soul, which is the breath of life, is in the whole
body, and chiefly in the heart. Therefore it was not fittingly said: "He
breathed into his face the breath of life."
Objection 5: Further, the male and female sex belong to the body, while the
image of God belongs to the soul. But the soul, according to Augustine
(Gen. ad lit. vii, 24), was made before the body. Therefore having said:
"To His image He made them," he should not have added, "male and female
He created them."
On the contrary, Is the authority of Scripture.
Reply to Objection 1: As Augustine observes (Gen. ad lit. vi, 12), man surpasses
other things, not in the fact that God Himself made man, as though He did
not make other things; since it is written (@Ps. 101:26), "The work of Thy
hands is the heaven," and elsewhere (@Ps. 94:5), "His hands laid down the
dry land"; but in this, that man is made to God's image. Yet in
describing man's production, Scripture uses a special way of speaking, to
show that other things were made for man's sake. For we are accustomed to
do with more deliberation and care what we have chiefly in mind.
Reply to Objection 2: We must not imagine that when God said "Let us make man,"
He spoke to the angels, as some were perverse enough to think. But by
these words is signified the plurality of the Divine Person, Whose image
is more clearly expressed in man.
Reply to Objection 3: Some have thought that man's body was formed first in
priority of time, and that afterwards the soul was infused into the
formed body. But it is inconsistent with the perfection of the production
of things, that God should have made either the body without the soul, or
the soul without the body, since each is a part of human nature. This is
especially unfitting as regards the body, for the body depends on the
soul, and not the soul on the body.
To remove the difficulty some have said that the words, "God made man,"
must be understood of the production of the body with the soul; and that
the subsequent words, "and He breathed into his face the breath of life,"
should be understood of the Holy Ghost; as the Lord breathed on His
Apostles, saying, "Receive ye the Holy Ghost" (@Jn. 20:22). But this
explanation, as Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xiii, 24), is excluded by the
very words of Scripture. For we read farther on, "And man was made a
living soul"; which words the Apostle (@1 Cor. 15:45) refers not to
spiritual life, but to animal life. Therefore, by breath of life we must
understand the soul, so that the words, "He breathed into his face the
breath of life," are a sort of exposition of what goes before; for the
soul is the form of the body.
Reply to Objection 4: Since vital operations are more clearly seen in man's face,
on account of the senses which are there expressed; therefore Scripture
says that the breath of life was breathed into man's face.
Reply to Objection 5: According to Augustine (Gen. ad lit. iv, 34), the works of
the six days were done all at one time; wherefore according to him man's
soul, which he holds to have been made with the angels, was not made
before the sixth day; but on the sixth day both the soul of the first man
was made actually, and his body in its causal elements. But other doctors
hold that on the sixth day both body and soul of man were actually made.