FOX'S BOOK OF MARTYRS
CHAPTER IV
Papal Persecutions
Thus far our history of persecution has been confined principally to the
pagan world. We come now to a period when persecution, under the guise of
Christianity, committed more enormities than ever disgraced the annals of
paganism. Disregarding the maxims and the spirit of the Gospel, the papal
Church, arming herself with the power of the sword, vexed the Church of God and
wasted it for several centuries, a period most appropriately termed in history,
the "dark ages." The kings of the earth, gave their power to the "Beast," and
submitted to be trodden on by the miserable vermin that often filled the papal
chair, as in the case of Henry, emperor of Germany. The storm of papal
persecution first burst upon the Waldenses in France.
Persecution of the Waldenses in France
Popery having brought various innovations into the Church, and overspread
the Christian world with darkness and superstition, some few, who plainly
perceived the pernicious tendency of such errors, determined to show the light
of the Gospel in its real purity, and to disperse those clouds which artful
priests had raised about it, in order to blind the people, and obscure its real
brightness.
The principal among these was Berengarius, who, about the year 1000,
boldly preached Gospel truths, according to their primitive purity. Many, from
conviction, assented to his doctrine, and were, on that account, called
Berengarians. To Berengarius succeeded Peer Bruis, who preached at Toulouse,
under the protection of an earl, named Hildephonsus; and the whole tenets of
the reformers, with the reasons of their separation from the Church of Rome,
were published in a book written by Bruis, under the title of "Antichrist."
By the year of Christ 1140, the number of the reformed was very great, and
the probability of its increasing alarmed the pope, who wrote to several
princes to banish them from their dominions, and employed many learned men to
write against their doctrines.
In A.D. 1147, because of Henry of Toulouse, deemed their most eminent
preacher, they were called Henericians; and as they would not admit of any
proofs relative to religion, but what could be deduced from the Scriptures
themselves, the popish party gave them the name of apostolics. At length,
Peter Waldo, or Valdo, a native of Lyons, eminent for his piety and learning,
became a strenuous opposer of popery; and from him the reformed, at that time,
received the appellation of Waldenses or Waldoys.
Pope Alexander III being informed by the bishop of Lyons of these
transactions, excommunicated Waldo and his adherents, and commanded the bishop
to exterminate them, if possible, from the face of the earth; hence began the
papal persecutions against the Waldenses.
The proceedings of Waldo and the reformed, occasioned the first rise of
the inquisitors; for Pope Innocent III authorized certain monks as inquisitors,
to inquire for, and deliver over, the reformed to the secular power. The
process was short, as an accusation was deemed adequate to guilt, and a candid
trial was never granted to the accused.
The pope, finding that these cruel means had not the intended effect, sent
several learned monks to preach among the Waldenses, and to endeavor to argue
them out of their opinions. Among these monks was one Dominic, who appeared
extremely zealous in the cause of popery. This Dominic instituted an order,
which, from him, was called the order of Dominican friars; and the members of
this order have ever since been the principal inquisitors in the various
inquisitions in the world. The power of the inquisitors was unlimited; they
proceeded against whom they pleased, without any consideration of age, sex, or
rank. Let the accusers be ever so infamous, the accusation was deemed valid;
and even anonymous informations, sent by letter, were thought sufficient
evidence. To be rich was a crime equal to heresy; therefore many who had money
were accused of heresy, or of being favorers of heretics, that they might be
obliged to pay for their opinions. The dearest friends or nearest kindred
could not, without danger, serve any one who was imprisoned on account of
religion. To convey to those who were confined, a little straw, or give them a
cup of water, was called favoring of the heretics, and they were prosecuted
accordingly. No lawyer dared to plead for his own brother, and their malice
even extended beyond the grave; hence the bones of many were dug up and burnt,
as examples to the living. If a man on his deathbed was accused of being a
follower of Waldo, his estates were confiscated, and the heir to them defrauded
of his inheritance; and some were sent to the Holy Land, while the Dominicans
took possession of their houses and properties, and, when the owners returned,
would often pretend not to know them. These persecutions were continued for
several centuries under different popes and other great dignitaries of the
Catholic Church.
Persecutions of the Albigenses
The Albigenses were a people of the reformed religion, who inhabited the
country of Albi. They were condemned on the score of religion in the Council
of Lateran, by order of Pope Alexander III. Nevertheless, they increased so
prodigiously, that many cities were inhabited by persons only of their
persuasion, and several eminent noblemen embraced their doctrines. Among the
latter were Raymond, earl of Toulouse, Raymond, earl of Foix, the earl of
Beziers, etc.
A friar, named Peter, having been murdered in the dominions of the earl of
Toulouse, the pope made the murder a pretense to persecute that nobleman and
his subjects. To effect this, he sent persons throughout all Europe, in order
to raise forces to act coercively against the Albigenses, and promised paradise
to all that would come to this war, which he termed a Holy War, and bear arms
for forty days. The same indulgences were likewise held out to all who entered
themselves for the purpose as to such as engaged in crusades to the Holy Land.
The brave earl defended Toulouse and other places with the most heroic bravery
and various success against the pope's legates and Simon, earl of Montfort, a
bigoted Catholic nobleman. Unable to subdue the earl of Toulouse openly, the
king of France, and the queen mother, and three archbishops raised another
formidable army, and had the art to persuade the earl of Toulouse to come to a
conference, when he was treacherously seized upon, made a prisoner, forced to
appear barefooted and bareheaded before his enemies, and compelled to subscribe
an abject recantation. This was followed by a severe persecution against the
Albigenses; and express orders that the laity should not be permitted to read
the sacred Scriptures. In the year 1620 also, the persecution against the
Albigenses was very severe. In 1648 a heavy persecution raged throughout
Lithuania and Poland. The cruelty of the Cossacks was so excessive that the
Tartars themselves were ashamed of their barbarities. Among others who
suffered was the Rev. Adrian Chalinski, who was roasted alive by a slow fire,
and whose sufferings and mode of death may depict the horrors which the
professors of Christianity have endured from the enemies of the Redeemer.
The reformation of papistical error very early was projected in France;
for in the third century a learned man, named Almericus, and six of his
disciples, were ordered to be burnt at Paris for asserting that God was no
otherwise present in the sacramental bread than in any other bread; that it was
idolatry to build altars or shrines to saints and that it was ridiculous to
offer incense to them.
The martyrdom of Almericus and his pupils did not, however, prevent many
from acknowledging the justness of his notions, and seeing the purity of the
reformed religion, so that the faith of Christ continually increased, and in
time not only spread itself over many parts of France, but diffused the light
of the Gospel over various other countries.
In the year 1524, at a town in France, called Melden, one John Clark set
up a bill on the church door, wherein he called the pope Antichrist. For this
offence he was repeatedly whipped, and then branded on the forehead. Going
afterward to Mentz, in Lorraine, he demolished some images, for which he had
his right hand and nose cut off, and his arms and breast torn with pincers. He
sustained these cruelties with amazing fortitude, and was even sufficiently
cool to sing the One hundredth and fifteenth Psalm, which expressly forbids
idolatry; after which he was thrown into the fire, and burnt to ashes.
Many persons of the reformed persuasion were, about this time, beaten,
racked, scourged, and burnt to death, in several parts of France, but more
particularly at Paris, Malda, and Limosin.
A native of Malda was burnt by a slow fire, for saying that Mass was a
plain denial of the death and passion of Christ. At Limosin, John de Cadurco,
a clergyman of the reformed religion, was apprehended and ordered to be burnt.
Francis Bribard, secretary to cardinal de Pellay, for speaking in favor of
the reformed, had his tongue cut out, and was then burnt, A.D. 1545. James
Cobard, a schoolmaster in the city of St. Michael, was burnt, A.D. 1545, for
saying 'That Mass was useless and absurd'; and about the same time, fourteen
men were burnt at Malda, their wives being compelled to stand by and behold the
execution.
A.D. 1546, Peter Chapot brought a number of Bibles in the French tongue to
France, and publicly sold them there; for which he was brought to trial,
sentenced, and executed a few days afterward. Soon after, a cripple of Meaux,
a schoolmaster of Fera, named Stephen Poliot, and a man named John English,
were burnt for the faith.
Monsieur Blondel, a rich jeweler, was, in A.D. 1548, apprehended at Lyons,
and sent to Paris; there he was burnt for the faith by order of the court, A.D.
1549. Herbert, a youth of nineteen years of age, was committed to the flames
at Dijon; as was also Florent Venote in the same year.
In the year 1554, two men of the reformed religion, with the son and
daughter of one of them, were apprehended and committed to the castle of
Niverne. On examination, they confessed their faith, and were ordered to
execution; being smeared with grease, brimstone, and gunpowder, they cried,
"Salt on, salt on this sinful and rotten flesh." Their tongues were then cut
out, and they were afterward committed to the flames, which soon consumed them,
by means of the combustible matter with which they were besmeared.
The Bartholomew Massacre at Paris, etc.
On the twenty second day of August, 1572, commenced this diabolical act of
sanguinary brutality. It was intended to destroy at one stroke the root of the
Protestant tree, which had only before partially suffered in its branches. The
king of France had artfully proposed a marriage, between his sister and the
prince of Navarre, the captain and prince of the Protestants. This imprudent
marriage was publicly celebrated at Paris, August 18, by the cardinal of
Bourbon, upon a high stage erected for the purpose. They dined in great pomp
with the bishop, and supped with the king at Paris. Four days after this, the
prince (Coligny), as he was coming from the Council, was shot in both arms; he
then said to Maure, his deceased mother's minister, "O my brother, I do now
perceive that I am indeed beloved of my God, since for His most holy sake I am
wounded." Although the Vidam advised him to fly, yet he abode in Paris, and
was soon after slain by Bemjus; who afterward declared he never saw a man meet
death more valiantly than the admiral.
The soldiers were appointed at a certain signal to burst out instantly to
the slaughter in all parts of the city. When they had killed the admiral, they
threw him out at a window into the street, where his head was cut off, and sent
to the pope. The savage papists, still raging against him, cut off his arms
and private members, and, after dragging him three days through the streets,
hung him by the heels without the city. After him they slew many great and
honorable persons who were Protestants; as Count Rochfoucault, Telinius, the
admiral's son-in-law, Antonius, Clarimontus, marquis of Ravely, Lewes Bussius,
Bandineus, Pluvialius, Burneius, etc., and falling upon the common people, they
continued the slaughter for many days; in the three first they slew of all
ranks and conditions to the number of ten thousand. The bodies were thrown
into the rivers, and blood ran through the streets with a strong current, and
the river appeared presently like a stream of blood. So furious was their
hellish rage, that they slew all papists whom they suspected to be not very
staunch to their diabolical religion. From Paris the destruction spread to all
quarters of the realm.
At Orleans, a thousand were slain of men, women, and children, and six
thousand at Rouen.
At Meldith, two hundred were put into prison, and later brought out by
units, and cruelly murdered.
At Lyons, eight hundred were massacred. Here children hanging about their
parents, and parents affectionately embracing their children, were pleasant
food for the swords and bloodthirsty minds of those who call themselves the
Catholic Church. Here three hundred were slain in the bishop's house; and the
impious monks would suffer none to be buried.
At Augustobona, on the people hearing of the massacre at Paris, they shut
their gates that no Protestants might escape, and searching diligently for
every individual of the reformed Church, imprisoned and then barbarously
murdered them. The same curelty they practiced at Avaricum, at Troys, at
Toulouse, Rouen and many other places, running from city to city, towns, and
villages, through the kingdom.
As a corroboration of this horrid carnage, the following interesting
narrative, written by a sensible and learned Roman Catholic, appears in this
place, with peculiar propriety.
"The nuptials (says he) of the young king of Navarre with the French
king's sister, was solemnized with pomp; and all the endearments, all the
assurances of friendship, all the oaths sacred among men, were profusely
lavished by Catharine, the queen-mother, and by the king; during which, the
rest of the court thought of nothing but festivities, plays, and masquerades.
At last, at twelve o'clock at night, on the eve of St. Bartholomew, the signal
was given. Immediately all the houses of the Protestants were forced open at
once. Admiral Coligny, alarmed by the uproar jumped out of bed, when a company
of assassins rushed in his chamber. They were headed by one Besme, who had
been bred up as a domestic in the family of the Guises. This wretch thrust his
sword into the admiral's breast, and also cut him in the face. Besme was a
German, and being afterwards taken by the Protestants, the Rochellers would
have brought him, in order to hang and quarter him; but he was killed by one
Bretanville. Henry, the young duke of Guise, who afterwards framed the
Catholic league, and was murdered at Blois, standing at the door until the
horrid butchery should be completed, called aloud, 'Besme! is it done?'
Immediately after this, the ruffians threw the body out of the window, and
Coligny expired at Guise's feet.
"Count de Teligny also fell a sacrifice. He had married, about ten months
before, Coligny's daughter. His countenance was so engaging, that the
ruffians, when they advanced in order to kill him, were struck with compassion;
but others, more barbarous, rushing forward, murdered him.
"In the meantime, all the friends of Coligny were assassinated throughout
Paris; men, women, and children were promiscuously slaughtered and every street
was strewed with expiring bodies. Some priests, holding up a crucifix in one
hand, and a dagger in the other, ran to the chiefs of the murderers, and
strongly exhorted them to spare neither relations nor friends.
"Tavannes, marshal of France, an ignorant, superstitious soldier, who
joined the fury of religion to the rage of party, rode on horseback through the
streets of Paris, crying to his men, 'Let blood! let blood! bleeding is as
wholesome in August as in May.' In the memories of the life of this
enthusiastic, written by his son, we are told that the father, being on his
deathbed, and making a general confession of his actions, the priest said to
him, with surprise, 'What! no mention of St. Bartholomew's massacre?' to which
Tavannes replied, 'I consider it as a meritorious action, that will wash away
all my sins.' Such horrid sentiments can a false spirit of religion inspire!
"The king's palace was one of the chief scenes of the butchery; the king
of Navarre had his lodgings in the Louvre, and all his domestics were
Protestants. Many of these were killed in bed with their wives; others,
running away naked, were pursued by the soldiers through the several rooms of
the palace, even to the king's antichamber. The young wife of Henry of
Navarre, awaked by the dreadful uproar, being afraid for her consort, and for
her own life, seized with horror, and half dead, flew from her bed, in order to
throw herself at the feet of the king her brother. But scarce had she opened
her chamber door, when some of her Protestant domestics rushed in for refuge.
The soldiers immediately followed, pursued them in sight of the princess, and
killed one who crept under her bed. Two others, being wounded with halberds,
fell at the queen's feet, so that she was covered with blood.
"Count de la Rochefoucault, a young nobleman, greatly in the king's favor
for his comely air, his politeness, and a certain peculiar happiness in the
turn of his conversation, had spent the evening until eleven o'clock with the
monarch, in pleasant familiarity; and had given a loose, with the utmost mirth,
to the sallies of his imagination. The monarch felt some remorse, and being
touched with a kind of compassion, bid him, two or three times, not to go home,
but lie in the Louvre. The count said he must go to his wife; upon which the
king pressed him no farther, but said, 'Let him go! I see God has decreed his
death.' And in two hours after he was murdered.
"Very few of the Protestants escaped the fury of their enthusiastic
persecutors. Among these was young La Force (afterwards the famous Marshal de
la Force) a child about ten years of age, whose deliverance was exceedingly
remarkable. His father, his elder brother, and he himself were seized together
by the Duke of Anjou's soldier. These murderers flew at all three, and struck
them at random, when they all fell, and lay one upon another. The youngest did
not receive a single blow, but appearing as if he was dead, escaped the next
day; and his life, thus wonderfully preserved, lasted four score and five
years.
"Many of the wretched victims fled to the water side, and some swam over
the Seine to the suburbs of St. Germaine. The king saw them from his window,
which looked upon the river, and fired upon them with a carbine that had been
loaded for that purpose by one of his pages; while the queen-mother,
undisturbed and serene in the midst of slaughter, looking down from a balcony,
encouraged the murderers and laughed at the dying groans of the slaughtered.
This barbarous queen was fired with a restless ambition, and she perpetually
shifted her party in order to satiate it.
"Some days after this horrid transaction, the French court endeavored to
palliate it by forms of law. They pretended to justify the massacre by a
calumny, and accused the admiral of a conspiracy, which no one believed. The
parliament was commended to proceed against the memory of Coligny; and his dead
body was hanged in chains on Montfaucon gallows. The king himself went to view
this shocking spectacle. So one of his courtiers advised him to retire, and
complaining of the stench of the corpse, he replied, 'A dead enemuy smells
well.' The massacres on St. Bartholomew's day are painted in the royal saloon
of the Vatican at Rome, with the following inscription: Pontifex, Coligny
necem probat, i.e., 'The pope approves of Coligny's death.'
"The young king of Navarre was spared through policy, rather than from the
pity of the queen-mother, she keeping him prisoner until the king's death, in
order that he might be as a security and pledge for the submission of such
Protestants as might effect their escape.
"This horrid butchery was not confined merely to the city of Paris. The
like orders were issued from court to the governors of all the provinces in
France; so that, in a week's time, about one hundred thousand Protestants were
cut to pieces in different parts of the kingdom! Two or three governors only
refused to obey the king's orders. One of these, named Montmorrin, governor of
Auvergne, wrote the king the following letter, which deserves to be transmitted
to the latest posterity.
"SIRE: I have received an order, under your majesty's seal, to put to
death all the Protestants in my province. I have too much respect for your
majesty, not to believe the letter a forgery; but if (which God forbid) the
order should be genuine, I have too much respect for your majesty to obey it."
At Rome the horrid joy was so great, that they appointed a day of high
festival, and a jubilee, with great indulgence to all who kept it and showed
every expression of gladness they could devise! and the man who first carried
the news received 1000 crowns of the cardinal of Lorraine for his ungodly
message. The king also commanded the day to be kept with every demonstration
of joy, concluding now that the whole race of Huguenots was extinct.
Many who gave great sums of money for their ransom were immediately after
slain; and several towns, which were under the king's promise of protection and
safety, were cut off as soon as they delivered themselves up, on those
promises, to his generals or captains.
At Bordeaux, at the instigation of a villainous monk, who used to urge the
papists to slaughter in his sermons, two hundred and sixty-four were cruelly
murdered; some of them senators. Another of the same pious fraternity produced
a similar slaughter at Agendicum, in Maine, where the populace at the holy
inquisitors' satanical suggestion, ran upon the Protestants, slew them,
plundered their houses, and pulled down their church.
The duke of Guise, entering into Blois, suffered his soldiers to fly upon
the spoil, and slay or drown all the Protestants they could find. In this they
spared neither age nor sex; defiling the women, and then murdering them; from
whence he went to Mere, and committed the same outrages for many days together.
Here they found a minister named Cassebonius, and threw him into the river.
At Anjou, they slew Albiacus, a minister; and many women were defiled and
murdered there; among whom were two sisters, abused before their father, whom
the assassins bound to a wall to see them, and then slew them and him.
The president of Turin, after giving a large sum for his life, was cruelly
beaten with clubs, stripped of his clothes, and hung feet upwards, with his
head and breast in the river: before he was dead, they opened his belly,
plucked out his entrails, and threw them into the river; and then carried his
heart about the city upon a spear.
At Barre great cruelty was used, even to young children, whom they cut
open, pulled out their entrails, which through very rage they gnawed with their
teeth. Those who had fled to the castle, when they yielded, were almost
hanged. Thus they did at the city of Matiscon; counting it sport to cut off
their arms and legs and afterward kill them; and for the entertainment of their
visitors, they often threw the Protestants from a high bridge into the river,
saying, "Did you ever see men leap so well?"
At Penna, after promising them safety, three hundred were inhumanly
butchered; and five and forty at Albia, on the Lord's Day. At Nonne, though it
yielded on conditions of safeguard, the most horrid spectacles were exhibited.
Persons of both sexes and conditions were indiscriminately murdered; the
streets ringing with doleful cries, and flowing with blood; and the houses
flaming with fire, which the abandoned soldiers had thrown in. One woman,
being dragged from her hiding place with her husband, was first abused by the
brutal soldiers, and then with a sword which they commanded her to draw, they
forced it while in her hands into the bowels of her husband.
At Samarobridge, they murdered above one hundred Protestants, after
promising them peace; and at Antsidor, one hundred were killed, and cast part
into a jakes, and part into a river. One hundred put into a prison at Orleans,
were destroyed by the furious multitude.
The Protestants at Rochelle, who were such as had miraculously escaped the
rage of hell, and fled there, seeing how ill they fared who submitted to those
holy devils, stood for their lives; and some other cities, encouraged thereby,
did the like. Against Rochelle, the king sent almost the whole power of
France, which besieged it seven months; though by their assaults, they did very
little execution on the inhabitants, yet by famine, they destroyed eighteen
thousand out of two and twenty. The dead, being too numerous for the living to
bury, became food for vermin and carnivorous birds. Many took their coffins
into the church yard, laid down in them, and breathed their last. Their diet
had long been what the minds of those in plenty shudder at; even human flesh,
entrails, dung, and the most loathsome things, became at last the only food of
those champions for that truth and liberty, of which the world was not worthy.
At every attack, the besiegers met with such an intrepid reception, that they
left one hundred and thirty-two captains, with a proportionate number of men,
dead in the field. The siege at last was broken up at the request of the duke
of Anjou, the king's brother, who was proclaimed king of Poland, and the king,
being wearied out, easily complied, whereupon honorable conditions were granted
them.
It is a remarkable interference of Providence, that, in all this dreadful
massacre, not more than two ministers of the Gospel were involved in it.
The tragical sufferings of the Protestants are too numerous to detail; but
the treatment of Philip de Deux will give an idea of the rest. After the
miscreants had slain this martyr in his bed, they went to his wife, who was
then attended by the midwife, expecting every moment to be delivered. The
midwife entreated them to stay the murder, at least till the child, which was
the twentieth, should be born. Notwithstanding this, they thrust a dagger up
to the hilt into the poor woman. Anxious to be delivered, she ran into a corn
loft; but hither they pursued her, stabbed her in the belly, and then threw her
into the street. By the fall, the child came from the dying mother, and being
caught up by one of the Catholic ruffians, he stabbed the infant, and then
threw it into the river.
From the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, to the French Revolution, in 1789
The persecutions occasioned by the revocation of the edict of Nantes took
place under Louis XIV. This edict was made by Henry the Great of France in
1598, and secured to the Protestants an equal right in every respect, whether
civil or religious, with the other subjects of the realm. All those privileges
Louis the XIV confirmed to the Protestants by another statute, called the edict
of Nismes, and kept them inviolably to the end of his reign.
On the accession of Louis XIV the kingdom was almost ruined by civil wars.
At this critical juncture, the Protestants, heedless of our Lord's admonition,
"They that take the sword shall perish with the sword," took such an active
part in favor of the king, that he was constrained to acknowledge himself
indebted to their arms for his establishment on the throne. Instead of
cherishing and rewarding that party who had fought for him, he reasoned that
the same power which had protected could overturn him, and, listening to the
popish machinations, he began to issue out proscriptions and restrictions,
indicative of his final determination. Rochelle was presently fettered with an
incredible number of denunciations. Montauban and Millau were sacked by
soldiers. Popish commissioners were appointed to preside over the affairs of
the Protestants, and there was no appeal from their ordinance, except to the
king's council. This struck at the root of their civil and religious
exercises, and prevented them, being Protestants, from suing a Catholic in any
court of law. This was followed by another injunction, to make an inquiry in
all parishes into whatever the Protestants had said or done for twenty years
past. This filled the prisons with innocent victims, and condemned others to
the galleys or banishment.
Protestants were expelled from all offices, trades, privileges, and
employs; thereby depriving them of the means of getting their bread: and they
proceeded to such excess in this brutality, that they would not suffer even the
midwives to officiate, but compelled their women to submit themselves in that
crisis of nature to their enemies, the brutal Catholics. Their children were
taken from them to be educated by the Catholics, and at seven years of age,
made to embrace popery. The reformed were prohibited from relieving their own
sick or poor, from all private worship, and divine service was to be performed
in the presence of a popish priest. To prevent the unfortunate victims from
leaving the kingdom, all the passages on the frontiers were strictly guarded;
yet, by the good hand of God, about 150,000 escaped their vigilance, and
emigrated to different countries to relate the dismal narrative.
All that has been related hitherto were only infringements on their
established charter, the edict of Nantes. At length the diabolical revocation
of that edict passed on the eighteenth of October, 1685, and was registered the
twenty-second, contrary to all form of law. Instantly the dragoons were
quartered upon the Protestants throughout the realm, and filled all France with
the like news, that the king would no longer suffer any Huguenots in his
kingdom, and therefore they must resolve to change their religion. Hereupon
the intendants in every parish (which were popish governors and spies set over
the Protestants) assembled the reformed inhabitants, and told them they must,
without delay, turn Catholics, either freely or by force. The Protestants
replied, that they 'were ready to sacrifice their lives and estates to the
king, but their consciences being God's they could not so dispose of them.'
Instantly the troops seized the gates and avenues of the cities, and
placing guards in all the passages, entered with sword in hand, crying, "Die,
or be Catholics!" In short, they practiced every wickedness and horror they
could devise to force them to change their religion.
They hanged both men and women by their hair or their feet, and smoked
them with hay until they were nearly dead; and if they still refused to sign a
recantation, they hung them up again and repeated their barbarities, until,
wearied out with torments without death, they forced many to yield to them.
Others, they plucked off all the hair of their heads and beards with
pincers. Others they threw on great fires, and pulled them out again,
repeating it until they extorted a promise to recant.
Some they stripped naked, and after offering them the most infamous
insults, they stuck them with pins from head to foot, and lanced them with
penknives; and sometimes with red-hot pincers they dragged them by the nose
until they promised to turn. Sometimes they tied fathers and husbands, while
they ravished their wives and daughters before their eyes. Multitudes they
imprisoned in the most noisome dungeons, where they practised all sorts of
torments in secret. Their wives and children they shut up in monasteries.
Such as endeavored to escape by flight were pursued in the woods, and
hunted in the fields, and shot at like wild beasts; nor did any condition or
quality screen them from the ferocity of these infernal dragoons: even the
members of parliament and military officers, though on actual service, were
ordered to quit their posts, and repair directly to their houses to suffer the
like storm. Such as complained to the king were sent to the Bastile, where
they drank the same cup. The bishops and the intendants marched at the head of
the dragoons, with a troop of missionaries, monks, and other ecclesiastics to
animate the soldiers to an execution so agreeable to their Holy Church, and so
glorious to their demon god and their tyrant king.
In forming the edict to repeal the edict of Nantes, the council were
divided; some would have all the ministers detained and forced into popery as
well as the laity; others were for banishing them, because their presence would
strengthen the Protestants in perseverance: and if they were forced to turn,
they would ever be secret and powerful enemies in the bosom of the Church, by
their great knowledge and experience in controversial matters. This reason
prevailing, they were sentenced to banishment, and only fifteen days allowed
them to depart the kingdom.
On the same day that the edict for revoking the Protestants' charter was
published, they demolished their churches and banished their ministers, whom
they allowed but twenty-four hours to leave Paris. The papists would not
suffer them to dispose of their effects, and threw every obstacle in their way
to delay their escape until the limited time was expired which subjected them
to condemnation for life to the galleys. The guards were doubled at the
seaports, and the prisons were filled with the victims, who endured torments
and wants at which human nature must shudder.
The sufferings of the ministers and others, who were sent to the galleys,
seemed to exceed all. Chained to the oar, they were exposed to the open air
night and day, at all seasons, and in all weathers; and when through weakness
of body they fainted under the oar, instead of a cordial to revive them, or
viands to refresh them, they received only the lashes of a scourge, or the
blows of a cane or rope's end. For the want of sufficient clothing and
necessary cleanliness, they were most grievously tormented with vermin, and
cruelly pinched with the cold, which removed by night the executioners who beat
and tormented them by day. Instead of a bed, they were allowed sick or well,
only a hard board, eighteen inches broad, to sleep on, without any covering but
their wretched apparel; which was a shirt of the coarsest canvas, a little
jerkin of red serge, slit on each side up to the armholes, with open sleeves
that reached not to the elbow; and once in three years they had a coarse frock,
and a little cap to cover their heads, which were always kept close shaved as a
mark of their infamy. The allowance of provision was as narrow as the
sentiments of those who condemned them to such miseries, and their treatment
when sick is too shocking to relate; doomed to die upon the boards of a dark
hold, covered with vermin, and without the least convenience for the calls of
nature. Nor was it among the least of the horrors they endured, that, as
ministers of Christ, and honest men, they were chained side by side to felons
and the most execrable villains, whose blasphemous tongues were never idle.
If they refused to hear Mass, they were sentenced to the bastinado, of which
dreadful punishment the following is a description. Preparatory to it, the
chains are taken off, and the victims delivered into the hands of the Turks
that preside at the oars, who strip them quite naked, and stretching them upon
a great gun, they are held so that they cannot stir; during which there reigns
an awful silence throughout the galley. The Turk who is appointed the
executioner, and who thinks the sacrifice acceptable to his prophet Mahomet,
most cruelly beats the wretched victim with a rough cudgel, or knotty rope's
end, until the skin is flayed off his bones, and he is near the point of
expiring; then they apply a most tormenting mixture of vinegar and salt, and
consign him to that most intolerable hospital where thousands under their
cruelties have expired.
Martyrdom of John Calas
We pass over many other individual maretyrdoms to insert that of John
Calas, which took place as recently as 1761, and is an indubitable proof of the
bigotry of popery, and shows that neither experience nor improvement can root
out the inveterate prejudices of the Roman Catholics, or render them less cruel
or inexorable to Protestants.
John Calas was a merchant of the city of Toulouse, where he had been
settled, and lived in good repute, and had married an English woman of French
extraction. Calas and his wife were Protestants, and had five sons, whom they
educated in the same religion; but Lewis, one of the sons, became a Roman
Catholic, having been converted by a maidservant, who had lived in the family
about thirty years. The father, however, did not express any resentment or
ill-will upon the occasion, but kept the maid in the family and settled an
annuity upon the son. In October, 1761, the family consisted of John Calas and
his wife, one woman servant, Mark Antony Calas, the eldest son, and Peter
Calas, the second son. Mark Antony was bred to the law, but could not be
admitted to practice, on account of his being a Protestant; hence he grew
melancholy, read all the books he could procure relative to suicide, and seemed
determined to destroy himself. To this may be added that he led a dissipated
life, was greatly addicted to gaming, and did all which could constitute the
character of a libertine; on which account his father frequently reprehended
him and sometimes in terms of severity, which considerably added to the gloom
that seemed to oppress him.
On the thirteenth of October, 1761, Mr. Gober la Vaisse, a young gentleman
about 19 years of age, the son of La Vaisse, a celebrated advocate of Toulouse,
about five o'clock in the evening, was met by John Calas, the father, and the
eldest son Mark Antony, who was his friend. Calas, the father, invited him to
supper, and the family and their guest sat down in a room up one pair of
stairs; the whole company, consisting of Calas the father, and his wife, Antony
and Peter Calas, the sons, and La Vaisse the guest, no other person being in
the house, except the maidservant who has been already mentioned.
It was now about seven o'clock. The supper was not long; but before it
was over, Antony left the table, and went into the kitchen, which was on the
same floor, as he was accustomed to do. The maid asked him if he was cold? He
answered, "Quite the contrary, I burn"; and then left her. In the meantime his
friend and family left the room they had supped in, and went into a bed-
chamber; the father and La Vaisse sat down together on a sofa; the younger son
Peter in an elbow chair; and the mother in another chair; and, without making
any inquiry after Antony, continued in conversation together until between nine
and ten o'clock, when La Vaisse took his leave, and Peter, who had fallen
asleep, was awakened to attend him with a light.
On the ground floor of Calas's house was a shop and a warehouse, the
latter of which was divided from the shop by a pair of folding doors. When
Peter Calas and La Vaisse came downstairs into the shop, they were extremely
shocked to see Antony hanging in his shirt, from a bar which he had laid across
the top of the two folding doors, having half opened them for that purpose. On
discovery of this horrid spectacle, they shrieked out, which brought down Calas
the father, the mother being seized with such terror as kept her trembling in
the passage above. When the maid discovered what had happened, she continued
below, either because she feared to carry an account of it to her mistress, or
because she busied herself in doing some good office to her master, who was
embracing the body of his son, and bathing it in his tears. The mother,
therefore, being thus left alone, went down and mixed in the scene that has
been already described, with such emotions as it must naturally produce. In
the meantime Peter had been sent for La Moire, a surgeon in the neighborhood.
La Moire was not at home, but his apprentice, Mr. Grosle, came instantly. Upon
examination, he found the body quite dead; and by this time a papistical crowd
of people were gathered about the house, and, having by some means heard that
Antony Calas was suddenly dead, and that the surgeon who had examined the body,
declared that he had been strangled, they took it into their heads he had been
murdered; and as the family was Protestant, they presently supposed that the
young man was about to change his religion, and had been put to death for that
reason.
The poor father, overwhelmed with grief for the loss of his child, was
advised by his friends to send for the officers of justice to prevent his being
torn to pieces by the Catholic multitude, who supposed he had murdered his son.
This was accordingly done and David, the chief magistrate, or capitol, took the
father, Peter the son, the mother, La Vaisse, and the maid, all into custody,
and set a guard over them. He sent for M. de la Tour, a physician, and MM. la
Marque and Perronet, surgeons, who examined the body for marks of violence, but
found none except the mark of the ligature on the neck; they found also the
hair of the deceased done up in the usual manner, perfectly smooth, and without
the least disorder: his clothes were also regularly folded up, and laid upon
the counter, nor was his shirt either torn or unbuttoned.
Notwithstanding these innocent appearances, the capitol thought proper to
agree with the opinion of the mob, and took it into his head that old Calas had
sent for La Vaisse, telling him that he had a son to be hanged; that La Vaisse
had come to perform the office of executioner; and that he had received
assistance from the father and brother.
As no proof of the supposed fact could be procured, the capitol had
recourse to a monitory, or general information, in which the crime was taken
for granted, and persons were required to give such testimony against it as
they were able. This recites that La Vaisse was commissioned by the
Protestants to be their executioner in ordinary, when any of their children
were to be hanged for changing their religion: it recites also, that, when the
Protestants thus hang their children, they compel them to kneel, and one of the
interrogatories was, whether any person had seen Antony Calas kneel before his
father when he strangled him: it recites likewise, that Antony died a Roman
Catholic, and requires evidence of his catholicism.
But before this monitory was published, the mob had got a notion that
Antony Calas was the next day to have entered into the fraternity of the White
Penitents. The capitol therefore caused his body to be buried in the middle of
St. Stephen's Church. A few days after the interment of the deceased, the
White Penitents performed a solemn service for him in their chapel; the church
was hung with white, and a tomb was raised in the middle of it, on the top of
which was placed a human skeleton, holding in one hand a paper, on which was
written "Abjuration of heresy," and in the other a palm, the emblem of
martyrdom. The next day the Franciscans performed a service of the same kind
for him.
The capitol continued the persecution with unrelenting severity, and,
without the least proof coming in, thought fit to condemn the unhappy father,
mother, brother, friend, and servant, to the torture, and put them all into
irons on the eighteenth of November.
From these dreadful proceedings the sufferers appealed to the parliament,
which immediately took cognizance of the affair, and annulled the sentence of
the capitol as irregular, but they continued the prosecution, and, upon the
hangman deposing it was impossible Antony should hang himself as was pretended,
the majority of the parliament were of the opinion, that the prisoners were
guilty, and therefore ordered them to be tried by the criminal court of
Toulouse. One voted him innocent, but after long debates the majority was for
the torture and wheel, and probably condemned the father by way of experiment,
whether he was guilty or not, hoping he would, in the agony, confess the crime,
and accuse the other prisoners, whose fate, therefore, they suspended.
Poor Calas, however, an old man of sixty-eight, was condemned to this
dreadful punishment alone. He suffered the torture with great constancy, and
was led to execution in a frame of mind which excited the admiration of all
that saw him, and particularly of the two Dominicans (Father Bourges and Father
Coldagues) who attended him in his last moments, and declared that they thought
him not only innocent of the crime laid to his charge, but also an exemplary
instance of true Christian patience, fortitude, and charity. When he saw the
executioner prepared to give him the last stroke, he made a fresh declaration
to Father Bourges, but while the words were still in his mouth, the capitol,
the author of this catastrophe, who came upon the scaffold merely to gratify
his desire of being a witness of his punishment and death, ran up to him, and
bawled out, "Wretch, there are fagots which are to reduce your body to ashes!
speak the truth." M. Calas made no reply, but turned his head a little aside;
and that moment the executioner did his office.
The popular outcry against this family was so violent in Languedoc, that
every body expected to see the children of Calas broke upon the wheel, and the
mother burnt alive.
Young Donat Calas was advised to fly into Switzerland: he went, and found
a gentleman who, at first, could only pity and relieve him, without daring to
judge of the rigor exercised against the father, mother, and brothers. Soon
after, one of the brothers, who was only banished, likewise threw himself into
the arms of the same person, who, for more than a month, took every possible
precaution to be assured of the innocence of the family. Once convinced, he
thought himself, obliged, in conscience, to employ his friends, his purse, his
pen, and his credit, to repair the fatal mistake of the seven judges of
Toulouse, and to have the proceedings revised by the king's council. This
revision lasted three years, and it is well known what honor Messrs. de Grosne
and Bacquancourt acquired by investigating this memorable cause. Fifty masters
of the Court of Requests unanimously declared the whole family of Calas
innocent, and recommended them to the benevolent justice of his majesty. The
Duke de Choiseul, who never let slip an opportunity of signalizing the
greatness of his character, not only assisted this unfortunate family with
money, but obtained for them a gratuity of 36,000 livres from the king.
On the ninth of March, 1765, the arret was signed which justified the
family of Calas, and changed their fate. The ninth of March, 1762, was the
very day on which the innocent and virtuous father of that family had been
executed. All Paris ran in crowds to see them come out of prison, and clapped
their hands for joy, while the tears streamed from their eyes.
This dreadful example of bigotry employed the pen of Voltaire in
deprecation of the horrors of superstition; and though an infidel himself, his
essay on toleration does honor to his pen, and has been a blessed means of
abating the rigor of persecution in most European states. Gospel purity will
equally shun superstition and cruelty, as the mildness of Christ's tenets
teaches only to comfort in this world, and to procure salvation in the next.
To persecute for being of a different opinion is as absurd as to persecute for
having a different countenance: if we honor God, keep sacred the pure doctrines
of Christ, put a full confidence in the promises contained in the Holy
Scriptures, and obey the political laws of the state in which we reside, we
have an undoubted right to protection instead of persecution, and to serve
heaven as our consciences, regulated by the Gospel rules, may direct.